Friday, October 28, 2005

The dogs of small things

Movies. Why do we watch a movie? What drives a person to watch a movie? Mind you, movie-making is different. It is a career-driven aspiration for some people to make movies, earn money, fame and overall satisfaction. But movie-watching is a completely different subject. It deals with human nature, interests, experiences, acquaintances yadayadayada.

I realized one day, that if I want to tell people something I know, I am not sure about how my reaction would be once I have finished expressing what I wanted to say. Would I feel satisfied, peaceful, content or what!? So , here is something I am attempting..

Last week, I was in one of those big electronic markets which sells everything that has the letter 'e' in its name or whatever-its-called. After spending about twenty minutes browsing three floors, finding nothing interesting or rather, finding everything unaffordable, I walk down to the lower level of the store where they have one of the biggest DVD/CD collections in town. Now, I've had some titles in mind that I wanted to buy and add them to my modest collection. These include some movies from Hollywood and Bollywood which I have recently read reviews of, on the internet. Now, you may ask..is reading reviews my favorite pastime? You betcha..
So Im looking for this one title which I have heard rave reviews of, and as I recall..have seen the movie in one of those college parties when I was half-drunk. Now, Reservoir Dogs is not exactly everyone's favorite movie, but let me finish.

Quentin Tarantino is a great storyteller, for sure. He probably stole this script from someone or some book or just dreamed it up..(Written by him, actually). Now, direction is something which has to be developed over a period of time..not many people are born with the talent for directing movies. Starting from the first shot of this movie, you see situations which do not appear in your regular hollywood movies. The movie is bloody, sure..but its the way the editor cuts between the scenes which give you the hair-raising experience of watching this Tarantino movie.

The movie starts off with this bunch of guys sitting around a table having breakfast, or rather finishing up breakfast and discussing about random stuff. Yes, thats 'RANDOM STUFF'. For many, this will remind them of a scene between John Travolta and Samuel L. Jackson discussing about stuff relating to how fast food joints are known across the world. Pulp Fiction is considered a classic by many because of this unique methodology employed of getting the viewer involved in the proceedings of the movie. You first listen to these people talking, and initially, you can't help but wonder if the director is just trying to kill time with the wafer-thin storyline he has on his hands. You are right. That is exactly what the director has on his hands..a piece of story which probably has been recycled so many times in Hollywood, that it actually starts to smell like the trash-can in sardine-land. But then, as soon as the scene shifts, you see, on the screen, something so utterly indescribable, unrelated and unexpected that you can't help but again wonder why you had underestimated the director's talents in the first place
.
The story goes something like this..five people team up for a crime which goes wrong because someone tipped off the police. That someone is from the team of five. Tarantino does not make any mockery of the script by hiding things irrelevant to the narrative..instead, he concentrates on simple story-telling, taking the viewer from such a wonderful perspective of vision that you end up holding your breath for too long. He does not mock the viewer, instead he taunts them to guess how each character unfolds. Mr. Blonde, when first shown seems like a relatively harmless guy, loyal to his friends and wrestles with the ganglord's son. If you look at scenes of Michael Madsen having fun with the cop later on, you wouldn't want to even see the guy ever in your life, let alone wrestle with him. I seriously have second thoughts about being Madsen's fan. Harvey Kietel's character is again a revelation. Is this guy ruthless, caring, too sensitive, goddamit! What! Tim Roth is one of those underrated actors who need a movie like this to showcase their true potential. His agony, pain, helplessness and finally his apologetic scene stays with you for a long time even after the movie has ended.

I will not ask you to go watch this movie if you feel like watching it, if you like slick movies etc etc.. Instead, I will ask you rather to think about how you would imagine yourself to be in one of the character's shoes, if at all you get the chance to watch the movie. I would rate this movie as a classic example of story-telling at its best. Colorful.

No comments: